Register for The Brief
, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
During a contentious discussion in the Texas House regarding restrictions on minors’ access to library books containing sexually explicit content, emotions ran high and philosophical questions emerged on Friday. Key points included debating what constitutes sexual behavior, how teenagers ought to be educated about sexuality, and questioning whether renowned works such as “The Bluest Eye” and “Madame Bovary” can be considered overly explicit.
“This is a straightforward bill aimed at safeguarding our Texas children,” said Rep. Daniel Alders, R-Tyler, who authored the legislation.
House Bill 3225
, stated on Friday. “This legislation tackles a genuine problem we’ve observed in our public libraries statewide, doing so in a manner that is both sensible and efficient. The bill isn’t complex; it shouldn’t be contentious.”
Almost two hours of discussion followed the presentation of the bill, which was expected to vary.
One Democrat followed another, proposing multiple amendments and counterarguments to assert that the bill was overly broad and would limit young people’s access to literature that might assist them in navigating common adolescent challenges such as growing up, dating, sexuality, and related issues.
“You are equating sexually explicit or hazardous behavior with fundamental health education about puberty, which typically affects individuals during their early teenage years,” Representative Ann Johnson from Houston stated in objection to the proposal.
House Bill 3225 mandates that public libraries obtain parental approval before lending materials tagged as “sexually explicit” to individuals under 18 years old. This legislation characterizes sexually explicit content as including scenes of “actual or simulated sexual intercourse,” ” masturbation,” and “sado-masochistic abuse.”
The legislation permits imposing a civil fine of up to $10,000 on libraries failing to adhere to regulations. It also assigns the responsibility to the Texas State Library and Archives Commission for developing annual evaluation criteria for library collections.
The House initially approved the bill with a tally of 82 to 53 votes, primarily along partisan lines. This measure is part of a larger initiative.
broader effort
By state officials to enhance their oversight over the selection of books for public libraries and eliminate materials deemed sexually explicit. Opponents contend these actions aim specifically at works addressing topics related to gender and sexuality, with a focus on those featuring LGBTQ+ individuals and people of color.
Following another vote in the House, typically a mere formality, the legislation will then advance to the Senate.
Books that might be categorized as “sexually explicit” according to the bill’s criteria encompass well-known titles frequently read in high schools such as Wuthering Heights, The Lord of the Rings, As I Lay Dying, and Catch-22, stated Rep. Erin Zwiener, D-Driftwood. (It should be noted that the legislation includes an exemption for religious texts.)
She highlighted the importance of teenagers reading and interacting with narratives addressing subjects such as adolescence and sexuality, contending that public libraries serve as a better venue than social media for young people to acquire knowledge on these matters.
It’s really quite invaluable for our younger generation to be able to delve into the lives and experiences of others, understanding their perspectives on various issues,” Zwiener stated. “By reading a story about a 16-year-old grappling with the choice of engaging in sexual activity, it aids the reader in making informed decisions.
She proposed an adjustment to reduce the bill’s age limitations so they would only affect individuals younger than 13 years old. The lawmakers voted against this proposal with a tally of 86 to 58.
We all recognize that there’s a significant difference between how we approach a five-year-old versus a seventeen-year-old,” Zwiener stated. “Adolescents go through distinct experiences; they require access to varied information. Simply being underage doesn’t shield them from possibly finding themselves in a sexual encounter.
Republicans stated that the legislation does not control the type of content adolescents can view; instead, it aims to provide this authority to parents. They emphasized further that the primary objective of the bill is to shield kids from accidentally coming across inappropriate content.
It’s crucial that we safeguard our children in the state of Texas and make sure they have access to books at their public libraries for their well-being,” Alders stated. “We must also prevent them from inadvertently encountering content that could potentially haunt them for the rest of their lives.
Democrats stated that they concurred on shielding children from explicit content, pointing out that distributing pornography to minors is already against the law.
However, they contended that the bill was misdirected and too sweeping. They were concerned it might effectively cause public libraries to restrict teenagers from accessing any books beyond those in the children’s section.
The excessive sexualization of children is an issue—but you won’t find it in your local libraries,” Johnson stated, adding that she had the feeling she was living through scenes from “Footloose.
Libraries are “a beneficial educational space,” she stated. “To all those parents who often claim, ‘I do not wish my child to have exposure to such knowledge’—trust me, they will encounter this information anyway. The volumes you shouldn’t worry about are right there in your community library.”
The discussion became intensely personal and vivid at points, with
Johnson pressing Alders
Regarding the explanations of “sexual bestiality” and “sadomasochistic abuse,” and when he, as an adolescent male many years past, initially discovered masturbation.
“Masturbation. Are we familiar with this topic?” Johnson asked. Alders refuted the notion that it was part of basic health education.
Masturbation isn’t considered fundamental knowledge for teenagers? As a young man, do you genuinely wish to explain to me when you first learned about it?” Johnson asked. “I’d wager that at some point, you needed guidance from someone regarding what masturbation entails.
“I didn’t anticipate being questioned about this on the House floor,” Alders stated.
Zwiener, who supports an amendment aimed at reducing the age limit below 13, disclosed that she experienced sexual assault when she was 17. She also pondered how much of an impact a book reflecting similar experiences might have had on her.
She mentioned that having the right book could have assisted her in realizing sooner that she wasn’t at fault — that someone had wronged her,” she explained. She pointed out a passage from “The Perks of Being a Wallflower,” a coming-of-age story, where a teenager sees a sexual assault occur at a party and grasps that an injustice is taking place.
That’s a moment that motivates our youth to step in if they witness sexual assault,” she stated. “This scene prompts teens to pay attention to consent during interactions with one another, and it also aids survivors of sexual assault in realizing it isn’t their responsibility. Teenagers ought to have the opportunity to read books that teach these crucial lessons, irrespective of whether parents provide signed permissions.
The first group of speakers for TribFest has been revealed!
Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist
Maureen Dowd
; U.S. Rep.
Tony Gonzales
, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth City Mayor
Mattie Parker
; U.S. Sen.
Adam Schiff
, D-Cali.; and U.S. Rep.
Jasmine Crockett
, Dallas will take the stage from November 13-15 in Austin.
Get your tickets today!
